The Entire History Of Jehovah's Witnesses And Shunning

Introduction

The leadership of Jehovah's Witnesses made a remarkable change recently by addressing one of the most controversial aspects of their doctrine—disfellowshipping. Although they didn't entirely remove it, they changed the terminology, renaming it to "being removed from the congregation" rather than disfellowshipped. This change has led to much curiosity about the history of Jehovah's Witnesses and their relationship with shunning, communication, removing disfellowshipping, or whatever term describes the practice of social exclusion. To understand their journey, let's start at the very beginning.

[Music]

The Genesis of Jehovah's Witnesses

Jehovah's Witnesses trace their origins to the late 1800s during a pivotal period in American religious history known as the Second Great Awakening. This era marked a monumental shift from Calvinist views, which emphasized human depravity, to a more upbeat Evangelical perspective. The separation of church and state enabled anyone with a Bible and a willingness to interpret numerology to start a new religion. Among many emerging religious groups, Charles Taze Russell played a foundational role in what would become Jehovah's Witnesses.

Charles Taze Russell

Russell initially became disillusioned with religion following the death of a parent. However, a chance encounter with a preacher renewed his spiritual fervor, leading him to examine whether biblical scriptures matched traditional religious teachings. According to a December 1882 issue of the Watchtower, Russell stated that they did not disfellowship Christians over differences of opinion. This form of open inquiry was antithetical to then-established church practices.

Judge Rutherford and the 1920s

Following Russell's death, J.F. Rutherford took over as the leader. Under his administration, the organization distanced itself further from other church traditions, openly criticizing practices like excommunication, describing them as tools used by religious authorities to control congregants. However, Rutherford's era also saw failed apocalyptic predictions and internal conflicts, leading to divisions within Jehovah's Witnesses.

Nathan Knorr

In 1942, Nathan Knorr assumed control. Knorr sought to turn Jehovah’s Witnesses into a global organization with structured governance. In 1952, under Knorr’s leadership, the Watchtower published a significant article that formalized disfellowshipping, marking dissenters as a danger to communal purity.

Evolution of Disfellowshipping

1930 marked a turning point as Knorr's administration hardened the stance against former members. Disfellowshipped persons were to be shunned rigorously, not just within the congregation but also in their personal lives. This later led to multiple heartbreaks and tragedies among Jehovah’s Witness Families, affecting children, parents, and siblings alike.

Modern Era

Fast forward to the present, longtime rigid policies are witnessing some relaxation. The Internet and social media have lifted the veil on organizational practices, prompting governments in countries like Norway to reconsider the consequences of such extreme isolation. Recent changes in terminology from 'disfellowshipped' to 'removed from the congregation' mark another step towards softening policies.

However, it's important to note that core punitive measures are still in place, particularly concerning those labeled as "apostates." Despite euphemistic rebranding, the emotional and social hardships endured by former members and their families continue.

Keywords

• Charles Taze Russell
• Shunning
• Disfellowshipping
• Second Great Awakening
• Judge Rutherford
• Nathan Knorr
• Jehovah’s Witnesses
• Excommunication
• 1952 Watchtower
• Modern Era

FAQ

What is disfellowshipping in Jehovah's Witnesses?

Disfellowshipping is a form of excommunication used to maintain moral and spiritual cleanliness within the congregation by removing unrepentant wrongdoers.

How did the practice of disfellowshipping evolve?

It shifted from initial leniency under Charles Taze Russell to a more rigid administration under Nathan Knorr in the 1950s to stringent social exclusion tactics that include family members.

Have there been any changes to the disfellowshipping policy recently?

Yes, recent changes include renaming 'disfellowshipping' to 'being removed from the congregation' and allowing limited social interaction, like greeting removed members at meetings.

What are the emotional impacts of disfellowshipping?

Disfellowshipping often results in severe emotional distress, including loss of familial bonds, social isolation, and psychological harm to the disfellowshipped individual.

Why is disfellowshipping considered controversial?

The practice is controversial because it leads to complete social isolation, emotional trauma, and can have devastating effects on familial relationships, often seen as a tool for control rather than spiritual discipline.

How do modern technologies and social media impact Jehovah’s Witnesses?

The advent of technology and social media has shed more light on internal practices, leading to greater public awareness and external scrutiny, as demonstrated by legal actions in places like Norway.