Woman Sues over Sloppy Paint Job? | Part 1

Introduction

Miss Ringer is seeking a refund for painting work done by the defendant in her home. This work was undertaken in November 2017, and both parties acknowledge that a contract was created, although no signed copy was presented in court. According to the unsigned contract presented by Miss Ringer, the total estimated budget for the work was $ 3,800. The defendant asserts that a signed contract was left with Miss Ringer, as is customary with all his clients.

Miss Ringer extended the original scope of the painting work, resulting in a final bill in November 2017. However, the final invoice was dated January 2018, allegedly at Miss Ringer's request to aid her with tax purposes. The defendant admitted to altering the date for her tax benefits when questioned by the judge.

Fast forward two years, Miss Ringer has paid the defendant for his work but is now claiming that the paint job was substandard, causing issues such as paint peeling and bubbling. She is demanding a full refund. The judge emphasizes that a full refund is unlikely unless the paint has completely peeled off the walls. Miss Ringer presented recent photos and videos showing significant defects, such as paint melting off the walls and paint spatter on the bathroom floor.

The defendant argues that some areas might have appeared sloppy due to existing issues before their work or potentially improper maintenance by Miss Ringer. However, the judge acknowledged visible sloppiness in the work, with some areas not properly masked or taped off.

The judge then instructed Miss Ringer not to speak while she addressed the defendant.

Keywords

• Miss Ringer
• Defendant
• Painting Work
• Contract
• November 2017
• $ 3,800
• Peeling Paint
• Tax Purposes
• Final Invoice
• Sloppy Workmanship

FAQ

Q1: When was the painting work completed?

• The painting work was completed in November 2017.

Q2: What was the original estimated budget for the painting work?

• The original estimated budget was $ 3,800.

Q3: Why was the final invoice dated January 2018?

• The final invoice was dated January 2018 at Miss Ringer's request for tax purposes.

Q4: What issues did Miss Ringer experience with the paint job?

• Miss Ringer reported issues such as paint peeling, bubbling, and melting off the walls, as well as paint spatter on the bathroom floor.

Q5: What was the result of altering the date on the final invoice?

• The defendant admitted to altering the date on the final invoice to assist Miss Ringer with her taxes, which the judge acknowledged as an admission of tax fraud.

Q6: What did the judge say about the possibility of issuing a full refund?

• The judge indicated that a full refund would only be considered if the paint had completely peeled off the walls.

Q7: How did the judge respond to Miss Ringer's claims of sloppy workmanship?

• The judge noted that there was visible sloppiness in some parts of the job, such as improperly masked or taped areas.