ad
ad
Topview AI logo

#writing #nanowrimo pt 2

People & Blogs


Introduction

In recent discussions about the challenges faced by writers, particularly in the context of traditional publishing, it's important to address the systemic barriers that keep many aspiring authors from achieving their literary dreams. The advent of AI writing tools has certainly sparked conversation, especially considering the considerable amount of money funneled into these companies. A key question that arises is: why isn't this financial backing directed towards amplifying or creating free resources and programming workshops?

These resources could serve to enhance writing craft, improve the writing process, and disseminate valuable publishing knowledge. Instead, the overwhelming focus seems to be on using AI to streamline the creative process, framing the act of making art as something that needs to be expedited or overcome rather than enjoyed.

This viewpoint raises the argument that expecting writers to produce work in traditional ways could be considered ableist. Not every writer responds to the same creative processes, and for some, the journey of writing is an essential part of their experience. Unfortunately, by promoting AI as a solution to writing challenges, we may overlook the fact that it reductions an inherently human activity to mere efficiency, dismissing the rich complexities involved in creative expression.

Compounding these concerns is the sheer volume of sponsorship proposals I receive from AI writing tools on a daily basis. It was this deluge of requests that compelled me to create a video outlining my thoughts on this matter. Having collaborated with companies like Nanoro in the past and enjoying the experience, I find myself increasingly wary of the trend towards prioritizing technology over art.

As writers, we ought to advocate for a balance that celebrates the creative journey, ensuring that everyone has access to the resources needed to hone their craft and find joy in the writing process.


Keywords

  • Systemic barriers
  • Traditional publishing
  • AI writing tools
  • Free resources
  • Writing craft
  • Writing process
  • Ableism
  • Creative process

FAQ

Q: What are the systemic barriers in traditional publishing?
A: Systemic barriers refer to the obstacles that prevent aspiring authors from accessing the publishing world, which can include financial constraints, lack of resources or support, and biases inherent in the industry.

Q: Why is there a concern about AI writing tools?
A: The concern is that AI tools may devalue the creative process, framing art-making as something to be expedited, which could undermine the enjoyment and personal expression involved in writing.

Q: Is there an argument that using AI writing tools is ableist?
A: Yes, some argue that expecting all writers to conform to traditional methods may exclude those who do not benefit from such processes, making it an ableist expectation.

Q: What kind of resources should be created for aspiring writers?
A: Resources could include workshops, free courses, and access to writing craft and publishing knowledge, aimed at making the writing journey more accessible and enjoyable for everyone.

Q: Why did you decide to speak out against AI writing tool sponsorships?
A: The overwhelming number of sponsorship offers I received motivated me to express my thoughts on the topic and underscore the need for emphasis on the creative process rather than just efficiency in writing.