Wan 3.0 vs Seedance 2.0
Two AI video models, one Topview workspace. Compare duration, resolution, reference control, and pricing before you generate.
Side by Side
Same Prompt, Two Models
For each brief below, the same prompt and reference inputs (when used) are run through Wan 3.0 and Seedance 2.0 — no re-rolls. Watch both outputs and judge for yourself.
VFX Spectacle Comparison
Text Only
Prompt


Dialogue Scene Comparison
3 Images
Image Ref 1

Image Ref 2

Image Ref 3

Prompt
Ensemble Acting Comparison
Text Only
Prompt
Group Dance & Beat Sync Comparison
1 Image + Audio
Image Ref 1

Audio Ref
Beat track reference
Prompt
Literature Adaptation Comparison
Text Only
Faithfully adapted from The Wind in the Willows (1908), Ch. I — judge each model against the original passage shown alongside.
Prompt
Original Passage
"Believe me, my young friend, there is nothing—absolute nothing—half so much worth doing as simply messing about in boats. Simply messing," he went on dreamily: "messing—about—in—boats; messing—" "Look ahead, Rat!" cried the Mole suddenly. It was too late. The boat struck the bank full tilt. The dreamer, the joyous oarsman, lay on his back at the bottom of the boat, his heels in the air. "—about in boats—or with boats," the Rat went on composedly, picking himself up with a pleasant laugh." — Kenneth Grahame, The Wind in the Willows (1908), Chapter I, Project Gutenberg #27805 (Scribner 1913 ed.)
Game Boss Battle Comparison
2 Images
Image Ref 1

Image Ref 2

Prompt
Spec-by-Spec Comparison
Each value reflects how the model is represented on Topview. Wan 3.0 is in public beta and its figures are projected, not independently benchmarked.
| Dimension | Wan 3.0 | Seedance 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Alibaba | ByteDance |
| Model Type | Multimodal video model (closed public beta) | Dual Branch Diffusion Transformer |
| Deployment & Access | Hosted on Topview; paid API, no downloadable weights | Hosted on Topview; also on Dreamina (CapCut) and via official API (fal.ai, Together AI, Cloudflare, etc.) |
| Resolution (Topview) | 480p / 720p / 1080p | 480p / 720p / 1080p / 2160p (4K) |
| Duration | Up to 30s in a single continuous shot | 4s–15s per clip, selectable per second |
| Reference Inputs | Text, image, video, audio references — up to 10 images, 5 videos, 5 audio (20 combined) | Text, image, video, audio references — up to 9 images, 3 videos, 3 audio (15 combined) |
| Native Audio | Flagged on Topview across both text-to-video and reference-to-video generation | Flagged on Topview across both text-to-video and reference-to-video generation |
| Aspect Ratios | 16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 3:4 | 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 1:1, 4:3, 21:9 (plus adaptive) |
| Pricing Signal | On Topview, 0.3–1 credits/sec across 480p–1080p | On Topview, 0.5–7 credits/sec across 480p–2160p (4K) — pricier per second than Wan 3.0 at every shared resolution |
| Best For | Longer single-take stories, large reference mixes, lower cost at shared resolutions | Highest-resolution delivery (up to 4K), multi-platform availability |
Values follow Topview's production generator configuration for both models (selectable resolution tiers, duration ranges, and reference limits). Internet-search-grounded prompts are flagged for Seedance 2.0 across both text-to-video and reference-to-video generation, and for Wan 3.0 in reference-to-video generation only — not in plain text-to-video. Wan 3.0 is in public beta; its figures are reported at launch (2026-08-06) and shown as projected parameters — treat as directional, not vendor-confirmed benchmarks.
Where Each Model Stands Out
Wan 3.0
Longer Single-Take Stories
Generate a coherent continuous sequence up to 30 seconds in one pass.
Larger Combined Reference Mix
Accepts up to 20 combined references (10 images, 5 videos, 5 audio) on Topview, versus Seedance 2.0's 15 (9 images, 3 videos, 3 audio).
Reference-Locked World Building
Protect identity, props, and space across a longer narrative using omni reference.
Seedance 2.0
Up to 2160p (4K) Output
Select resolution up to 2160p (4K) on Topview, the highest tier in this comparison — well past Wan 3.0's 1080p ceiling.
Per-Second Duration Control
Pick any length from 4 to 15 seconds, selectable per second. Wan 3.0 also steps per second, across a longer 2–30s range.
Established Multi-Platform Availability
Also available via Dreamina (CapCut) and official APIs (fal.ai, Together AI, Cloudflare) beyond Topview.
Which Model Fits Your Workflow?
Match your project to the model built for it.
Longer continuous ad or brand story up to 30 seconds
Native single-shot generation up to 30s gives a complete idea room to build without cutting to a new clip.
Deliverable that must ship at high resolution (4K)
Seedance 2.0 selects up to 2160p (4K) on Topview; Wan 3.0 tops out at 1080p.
Short-form clip with exact second-level length
Duration is selectable per second from 4 to 15 seconds, covering most social and product cut-downs without moving to a 30-second model.
Projects that draw from a large mix of image, video, and audio source material
Wan 3.0 accepts up to 20 combined references (10 images, 5 videos, 5 audio) on Topview, versus Seedance 2.0's 15 (9 images, 3 videos, 3 audio).
Reference-locked identity or world across a longer sequence
Omni reference is designed to hold identity, props, and space consistent over more screen time.
Standard short-form cut where resolution still matters
4–15s clips cover most social and product cut-downs while still offering up to 4K.
Multi-platform pipeline beyond Topview
Seedance 2.0 is also available via Dreamina (CapCut) and official APIs (fal.ai, Together AI, Cloudflare) if you need it outside Topview.
Budget-conscious drafts at a shared resolution tier
At matching resolutions, Wan 3.0 is priced lower per second than Seedance 2.0 on Topview (e.g. 0.5 vs 1 credit/sec at 720p).
Frequently Asked Questions
Try Both Models on Topview
Same workspace, same references — pick the model that fits this project.









